Interaction of New Jersey Lack of Prosecution Dismissals with Federal COVID-Related Foreclosure Moratorium

Recently, S&E Attorney Lucas Anderson, Esquire, advised a client that a lack of prosecution warning had been received on one of their federally-backed mortgage foreclosure cases. The client asked: “How can the New Jersey state court dismiss this action if it is on hold because of the moratorium on foreclosure of federally-backed mortgages?” This question highlights one of the many issues facing mortgage lenders and servicers: state courts, where most foreclosures are prosecuted, are not obligated to recognize holds placed by entities such as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

New Jersey Court Rules (Rule 4: 64-8) provide that a foreclosure action shall be dismissed if no required action (e.g. the filing of an answer, motion for default, or motion for judgment) has been taken within 12 months. The federally-backed foreclosure moratorium has effectively halted the prosecution of federally-backed mortgage foreclosure actions for months, thus leaving these cases subject to dismissal under Rule 4: 64-8. Unfortunately, there is no way to avoid these dismissals, as the New Jersey State Court does not recognize the federally-backed foreclosure moratorium as a reason to avoid a lack of prosecution dismissal. However, the cases can be reinstated by motion once the moratorium has been lifted. Stern & Eisenberg’s attorneys are here to assist our clients with getting their cases reinstated and moving once the federal holds have been lifted. For questions, please reach out to Lucas Anderson.


Practice Areas

Send Us A Message